Rocks 'n' Diamonds

[Post a new comment]
Comments
[Show all 64 comment threads on one page]
[1-10] [11-20] [21-30] [31-40] [41-50] [51-60] [61-64] 

	Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by Vic-Viper @ 84.62.149.39 on Aug 27 2010 1:27 PM
I love it.
[Reply]

	Better than emulation posted by Brathering @ 84.141.70.39 on Jul 21 2010 10:32 PM
My favoured levelset is from 'Emerald Mine'. I am using a gamepad. Better than the original on my old Amiga.
[Reply]

	Why is R'd'D Jue not listed? posted by mbabuskov @ 193.34.64.63 on Jun 21 2010 1:55 PM
It should be listed, perhaps as a separate game. Graphics are awsome, modern looking, and games are really cool. I like Puzznic the most. I just discovered it by chance. While it is nice to have all the old games, Jue would not have all the "it's old and outdated" comments attached.
[Reply]

	Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by Rustybolts @ 82.11.17.104 on Nov 27 2009 5:59 PM
Nice polished little gem of a game.
[Reply]

	Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by Rustybolts @ 82.11.17.104 on Nov 27 2009 5:59 PM
Nice polished little gem of a game.
[Reply]

	Very entertaining posted by tcooke @ 121.45.139.181 on Dec 28 2007 12:43 AM
It's good to be able to play so many similar games (_Crystal Caves_, _Boulderdash_, _Supaplex_, etc) under the same program. I really liked _Boulderdash_ on the Commodore 64, and it was great to be able to play through all of the levels again. Even better, this program intoduced me to _Sokoban_ which I was not familiar with when I first downloaded this a few years ago. _Sokoban_ is supposed to be more of a turn-based puzzle game than the others, so it was a little annoying that if you pushed one block one square too far, preventing the level from being completed, that the level had to be restarted (rather than just taking back the previous push, as in other _Sokoban_ programs). Also, the number of user generated levels is very large, but many of them (at least of the ones I have tried) are just excuses to make pretty explosion patterns rather than to test brain or dexterity.
[Reply]

	Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by DaVince @ 145.92.21.21 on Oct 24 2007 10:59 AM
"Quality graphics"? Supaplex looks better than this... Downloading anyway, since I need such a game in Linux! :P
[Reply]
Re: Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by Anonymous @ 74.37.70.242 on Oct 24 2007 7:09 PM   Date of submission: 1998. Back when 1024x768 was a pretty huge resolution. Back when the LGT was much smaller, and most of the games listed suffered from a severe case of "programmer art". Yeah.   [Reply]   Re: Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by DaVince @ 62.51.153.52 on Oct 24 2007 11:05 PM   Ah, okay. I didn't see that submission date there. Heck, I didn't even know the LGT has been around that long!   [Reply]   Re: Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by Anonymous @ 62.78.137.56 on Oct 30 2007 8:05 PM   > "Quality graphics"? Supaplex looks better than this... R'n'D does include Supaplex levels and graphics among many other boulderdash variants it supports...   [Reply]

	Rocks 'n' Diamonds posted by Irrevenant @ 203.113.232.77 on May 12 2007 3:22 PM
[Reply]

	Levels posted by Anonymous @ 203.206.183.204 on Mar 26 2007 4:35 PM
I have a version of this on an older Linux OS, and it came with a pile of levels, including the original BD levels. On my newer FC5 system, there are a lot less levels. Ideas?
[Reply]
Re: Levels posted by SlackerTD @ 142.166.158.70 on Mar 27 2007 3:52 AM I don't know about the original BD levels, but the Levels & Artwork page has several sets of levels there, including one that has over fifty thousand levels.   [Reply]

	I tried download 3.3 - result: got 3.20 posted by Anonymous @ 84.60.151.160 on Feb 14 2007 9:00 AM
I tried download 3.3 - result: got 3.20 :-(((
[Reply]
Re: I tried download 3.3 - result: got 3 posted by Anonymous @ 84.60.151.160 on Feb 14 2007 9:03 AM   3.2.3 <-> 3.20 ! - my fault - sorry!   [Reply]